South Africa Unsatisfied with Trump’s Order to Grant Asylum to White Afrikaners

Date:

South Africa has strongly condemned the U.S. administration’s decision to grant refugee status to white South Africans, primarily Afrikaners, citing alleged racial persecution. The move, announced by former President Donald Trump, has sparked significant controversy both domestically and internationally.Reuters+4AP News+4The Times+4The Guardian

Background of the U.S. Decision

In early 2025, President Trump issued an executive order directing the U.S. government to prioritize refugee status for white South Africans, particularly Afrikaners, whom he claimed faced systemic racial discrimination under South Africa’s Black-led government. The administration cited incidents such as violent farm attacks and concerns over land expropriation policies as evidence of this persecution. The first group of over two dozen Afrikaner refugees is expected to arrive in the U.S. imminently .The GuardianAnadolu Ajansı+6AP News+6Central News+6

South Africa’s Response

The South African government has vehemently rejected these claims, labeling the U.S. actions as politically motivated and based on misinformation. President Cyril Ramaphosa emphasized that South Africa is a constitutional democracy that values all its citizens, regardless of race. He further criticized the U.S. for focusing on Afrikaners while vulnerable groups within the U.S. are being deported and denied asylum despite facing real hardships .AP NewsCentral News+2Los Angeles Times+2WSLS+2The Guardian+2WSLS+2Los Angeles Times+2

Afrikaner organizations, including Solidarity and AfriForum, have also expressed their intent to remain in South Africa. They argue that the portrayal of Afrikaners as a persecuted group is misleading, given their significant economic privileges and integration into South African society .The Times+7SFGATE+7Voice of America+7WSLS+3Voice of America+3AP News+3

International Reactions

The U.S. decision has elicited mixed reactions globally. The African Union condemned the move as a neo-colonial attack on African sovereignty, while BRICS nations, including Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, expressed solidarity with Pretoria. Human rights organizations have warned that the U.S. actions could exacerbate racial tensions in South Africa .Central News

Conclusion

The U.S. plan to accept white Afrikaners as refugees has ignited a complex debate over race, politics, and sovereignty. While the U.S. frames the decision as a humanitarian effort, South Africa views it as an unwarranted interference in its internal affairs. The situation underscores the challenges of addressing historical injustices while navigating contemporary political dynamics.

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

🇺🇸 Trump Leaves Military Option Open in Pursuit of Greenland

June 27, 2025 – Washington & Copenhagen — In...

Frederiksen Fortifies Greenland: Denmark Fights Trump’s Acquisition Plans

June 27, 2025 – Copenhagen & Nuuk — As...

Why Trump Eyes Greenland—and Why Its People Say “Not for Sale”

June 27, 2025 – Nuuk/Washington — Former President Donald...

Baseball, Brainpower & Breaths: How Long Walks Win in MLB

June 27, 2025 – MLB Clubhouse & Neuroscience Labs...

We use cookies to improve your experience, deliver personalized ads, and analyze traffic. By using The Copenhagen Times, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Privacy policy